A. Misconduct Directly Related to Texas Jurisdiction

• On March 20, 2024, in response to my investigation of his clients' activities at the Sierra del Sol (SDS) HOA in El Paso, Texas, Mr. Skipworth sent a letter from his Texas law office to me and a Texas homeowner. In this letter, he falsely claimed, "I represent the interests of Sierra del Sol." This was an attempt to intimidate me and interfere with my investigation. (Exhibit N)
• This claim was a material misrepresentation. Mr. Skipworth's own client, Gil Stoltz (a Texas resident), later testified under oath in a Texas deposition, "Robert Skipworth does not represent Sierra Del Sol." This was also publicly confirmed by the SDS board president, vice president, and the owner of its management company, DANA Properties (a Texas entity). (Exhibit AL, p. 39; Exhibit AI)
• On April 3, 2024, Mr. Skipworth was paid $150 from SDS HOA funds for "legal matters." Given that he did not represent the HOA, this suggests a pretextual payment, arranged by his clients who controlled the HOA's finances, to create a false paper trail for his claim of representation. (Exhibit P)
• After I publicly exposed his false statement at the SDS annual meeting on February 11, 2025, and had him trespassed from the property on February 15, 2025, Mr. Skipworth filed lawsuit 2025DCV1201 in El Paso County against me on behalf of Gil Stoltz and DANA Properties; they all three had an axe to grind. This lawsuit was a direct act of retaliation for exposing their misconduct. (Exhibit AI, Exhibit AJ)

B. Pattern of Misconduct Evidenced by Concurrent New Mexico Actions

Mr. Skipworth's actions in Texas are part of a broader pattern of unethical conduct, as demonstrated by his concurrent actions in a related matter involving the El Mirador HOA (EMHOA) in New Mexico, for which he was also counsel.

• Retaliatory Retention: On January 28, 2023, I questioned the EMHOA Treasurer's non-payment of dues. In retaliation, the board retained Mr. Skipworth, who immediately began preparing for a "laswuit [sic]" against me. (Exhibit A, Exhibit H)
• Complicity in a Cover-Up: Mr. Skipworth was consulted by the EMHOA board before they secretly filed a 16-year-old, procedurally invalid bylaw amendment to retroactively justify the Treasurer's actions. (Exhibit B, Exhibit J)
• Willful Negligence, Animus, and Dishonesty: When I formally notified him of his clients' unlawful actions, Mr. Skipworth admitted he had "not researched the accuracy" of my claims and dismissed the legal threat by stating I was "too cheap" to go to court. His emails show a clear personal animus, asking his client's agent, "When can I sue this guy?" Furthermore, after receiving a formal demand letter from the Davis Miles law firm on behalf of my wife in October 2023, Mr. Skipworth simply forwarded it to his client without advice. Ten months later, he falsely denied to his client's agent that he had ever received the letter. (Exhibit E, Exhibit AC, Exhibit L, Exhibit M, Exhibit V)
• Acting Without Client Authority: On November 21, 2024, Mr. Skipworth filed a foreclosure lawsuit in New Mexico against my wife, Leticia Trevino, in direct defiance of his client's formally adopted policy not to foreclose for amounts under $7,500. His own office had confirmed in writing just two days prior that the complaint "were not filed" per the board's instructions. (Exhibit U, Exhibit AF, Exhibit AG)